HazNode
HomePartnersAbout
Log In

HazNode® Safety · Owners & directors

Your duty is personal. You cannot delegate it away.

Under the Health and Safety at Work Act, an officer’s due diligence duty sits with the individual and cannot be handed to someone else. "I asked, and I was told it was under control" is not evidence of due diligence — a current record of what is actually happening is.

Explore the platform

What it gives you

The difference between being told and knowing

Most owners are not short of intent. They are short of a way to verify what they are being told, without becoming the person doing the work.

Person reviewing records on a screen

See it without asking for it

Current, not a monthly summary

Inspections completed, incidents reported and where they got to, hazards raised across every site — visible without someone preparing a report for you. What you are looking at is the record itself rather than a summary of it.

What you get

  • Inspections and their findings across sites

  • Incidents from report through to closure

  • Hazards and near misses as they are raised

  • The substance register as it actually stands

Worker completing documentation

Evidence with dates on it

For the day it is examined

Due diligence is assessed on what you did and when. A timestamped record built as the work happened is a materially different thing from a folder assembled after an event, and it is the difference that gets examined.

What you get

  • Timestamped as the work happened

  • Full history retained, not overwritten

  • Retrievable by site, date or person

  • Exportable when it is asked for

Reviewing operational records on a monitor

Notice what is not happening

Absence is the signal that matters

The useful question is rarely what was reported. It is which site has reported nothing for two months. A single record across the business makes that visible, where separate folders per site hide it completely.

What you get

  • Reporting activity visible per site

  • Repeat findings surfaced in the history

  • Incidents still open and how long for

  • Gaps as visible as activity

Sound Familiar?

Sound familiar?

"

You are told it is under control and have no way to check.

"

The reporting you see is a summary someone built for the meeting.

"

You could not evidence your own due diligence if you were asked tomorrow.

"

Each site does it differently, so nothing is comparable.

"

You find out about problems when they have already become expensive.

"

The person who knows where everything is kept could leave.

What changes

Verification instead of reassurance

Officers are not expected to do the work. They are expected to know it is being done, and to be able to show how they knew.

Due diligence you can evidence

A timestamped record of what was done, when, and by whom — rather than a recollection of having asked.

Problems visible earlier

Hazards and near misses reach you as a record rather than as news after something has already gone wrong.

Every site comparable

One system across the business, so you can see which site is quiet and ask why.

Not dependent on one person

The record lives in the business rather than in the head of whoever currently runs safety.

See what your own record would look like

The question worth answering is what you could produce if you were asked tomorrow. We will show you the view an owner gets, using a realistic setup.

haznode logo

© 2026 HazNode Software Limited. All rights reserved.